Zua and Mishio are two agrarian communities
located along the White Volta River running through the West Mamprusi District of
the Northern Region of Ghana. Both communities depend greatly on the river
water resources for their livelihoods, thus the two communities and the river seemed
almost inseparable just like a baby and its mother’s umbilical cord.
Thus,
as part of efforts to promote efficient and judicious use of water resources in
the communities under a climate change project dubbed “Fighting Climate Change Through
Reforestation” that was financed by German non-governmental
organisation Hanns-Seidel-Foundation, the West Mamprusi District Assembly and
her decentralised departments, carried out Integrated Water Resource Management
(IWRM) awareness education in the aforementioned communities in line with the
district’s agenda to strengthen local civil society capacity in the fight
against climate change.
Currently, the livelihoods
of the communities were under threat by sharing and utilising the river water
resources due to the dictates of climate change induced weather conditions.
Consequently,
IWRM was considered as a coordinated attempt to manage water related resources
in the areas in order to maximise economic and social welfare benefits by protecting
the district’s environment, foster economic growth and sustainable agricultural
development, promote good governance, and improve human health.
According to the Project Coordinator Issifu
Sulemana Jobila, the IWRM education enhanced the poor rural communities’ capacity
to practice and manage scarce water resources in the district by making prudent
decisions and taking actions while considering multiple view points of how water resources
should be used or shared.
The
basis for IWRM, he explained, was that the many different uses of limited water
resources were interdependent, citing for instance, small scale irrigation
demands and polluted drainage flows from agriculture means, less freshwater for
drinking or domestic use, contaminated wastewater from chemical fishing as
practiced currently by the communities pollute the river and threaten ecosystems.
“If water has to be left in a river to protect fisheries and ecosystems, less
can be diverted to grow crops”, he emphasised.
Realising
this, Mr. Jobila said the project’s overall goal as also captured in the
district’s development plan stipulated
that, local
civil society capacity be strengthened to
enable them take up their own local action or initiatives against climate
change and its affected crucial sectors of natural resources.
He
also noted that the introduction of IWRM awareness education was intended to build
the capacity of the people of Zua and Mishio so that they could manage scarce water resources during the lean
season (dry season) very well, thereby reducing conflicts among different
competing farmers over the use of water resources.
The programme was also to instil in members
of both communities the knowledge of integrated water resource management
practices so as to enable them adapt to climate change effects and impact.
In
all, a total of 212 people comprising of fishermen, traders, farmers, chiefs,
opinion leaders, women, and children participated in the programme. Out of this,
72 were female whiles 140 were male.
Participants
were taken through topics such as overview of integrated
water resource management under climate change, types of water resources and
principles of integrated water resource management, international agreements
and conventions under integrated water resource management, district
development agenda on water resources, upper and downstream issues of water resources,
among others.
No comments:
Post a Comment